The young emperor’s hand trembled as he signed the letter that would seal his empire’s fate. Outside the walls of Laxenburg Castle, the winter of 1917 gnawed at Vienna’s starving millions, and the Great War showed no mercy. Charles I of Austria-Hungary, barely thirty, had inherited a crumbling throne and a war he never wanted. Now, he was about to commit the ultimate act of desperation—or betrayal, depending on who you asked.
“You will take the 7:30 express to Zurich,” Charles instructed his confidant, Tomas Erdödy, on February 8, 1917. “As the emperor’s special emissary.” The mission was so secret that even the Austrian foreign ministry knew nothing. Charles was gambling everything on a back-channel peace deal with France—behind the backs of his German allies. If discovered, it would mean disgrace. If successful, it might save his dying empire.

Erdödy traveled under a false identity, carrying letters for Charles’s brothers-in-law, Prince Sixtus and Prince Xavier of Bourbon-Parma, who were serving in the Belgian army. The irony was bitter: family ties now bridged enemy lines. In neutral Switzerland, a hotbed of spies, the princes awaited the emperor’s message. The meeting took place in a lakeside house in Neuchâtel, where Erdödy handed over the letters and received France’s demands in return. “The message is clear,” Sixtus told him. “There will be no peace with the Entente without sacrifices.” Alsace-Lorraine must return to France. Belgium must be restored. Serbia must have sea access.
Charles read the demands and, to the horror of his foreign minister, agreed to most of them. “I will take it under consideration,” he said, knowing full well that ceding Alsace-Lorraine would mean betraying Germany. But Charles was desperate. The war had cost him his crown, his empire, and now his honor. He drafted a letter to President Poincaré, promising to support France’s “just demands” regarding Alsace-Lorraine. “In the hope that we can together end the suffering of so many millions of people,” he wrote.
The letter was delivered in secret to the Élysée Palace. For a moment, it seemed peace was within reach. But Charles made a fatal error: he failed to inform his German allies. When he finally met Kaiser Wilhelm II face-to-face, his courage failed him. He dropped vague hints but never admitted the truth. The Germans suspected something—their intelligence services had reports—but they couldn’t prove it. Not yet.
Then came the betrayal that unraveled everything. In April 1918, Austria’s foreign minister, Count Czernin, gave a speech in Vienna claiming that France’s prime minister, Clemenceau, had secretly sought peace. Clemenceau, furious, responded with two words: “That’s a lie.” And he had proof. Within days, the emperor’s letters were splashed across every newspaper in Europe. The scandal was total. Charles had been caught red-handed, negotiating with the enemy while lying to his ally.
“I have no knowledge of any letters,” Charles stammered, but it was too late. The Germans were appalled. Kaiser Wilhelm summoned Charles to Spa and humiliated him like a schoolboy, forcing him to sign away Austria’s military independence. “You are a traitor,” Wilhelm’s generals whispered. From that moment on, Austria-Hungary was a vassal state of the German Reich.
As the empire crumbled and the war entered its final, bloody act, Charles retreated to his chapel and prayed. The Habsburg dynasty, which had ruled for nearly 650 years, was coming to an end. And the man who had tried to save it with a secret peace would go down in history not as a peacemaker, but as the emperor who lost everything.
The imperial train carried Charles and Zita eastward through the dying autumn of 1918, past fields that had once fed an empire and now lay fallow and scarred. At every station, crowds gathered—some weeping, some jeering, most simply staring at the man who had worn the crown. Zita kept the curtains drawn, but Charles would not. “Let them see me,” he said quietly. “They have seen enough of my back.”
In the Romanian harbor town of Galați, the former rulers of Austria-Hungary waited for the British ship that would carry them into exile. The irony was not lost on Charles: the Entente, which he had secretly courted, was now his jailer. Captain Arthur Snack of HMS Glowworm received them with stiff courtesy. “I must ask for your word that there will be no attempt to flee,” he said. Charles gave it without hesitation. “I consider myself bound in honor to him personally,” he wrote in the ship’s log, signing himself Emperor of Austria, King of Hungary—titles that no longer existed.
The journey down the Danube became a slow funeral procession through the lands that had once answered to his crown. In Budapest, the regent Miklós Horthy—a man Charles had once promoted—refused to let the former king step ashore. In Belgrade, the Serbian capital that had sparked the war, crowds burned Habsburg flags. Zita watched the smoke rise from the deck and said nothing. She had never accepted the new Europe of nation-states, and she never would.
It was on the long, gray stretch of river between Bulgaria and Romania that Charles finally spoke of the Sixstus affair without flinching. “I thought the word of an emperor weighed more than the word of a president,” he confessed to Tomas Erdödy, who had accompanied the family into exile. “I was wrong. I thought I could save the empire by going around my allies. Instead, I gave them the knife to cut me with.” Erdödy recorded the words in his journal that night, noting that the emperor spoke without self-pity, only a strange, exhausted clarity.
Zita disagreed. “You acted as a Christian sovereign should,” she insisted. “You tried to stop the killing. History will judge you kindly.” But history, as Charles was beginning to understand, was not written by fallen emperors. It was written by the victors—and by the men who had watched him lie to his own allies.
In Vienna, the new republic had already stripped the Habsburgs of their property and their titles. The family’s vast estates, the palaces that had housed nineteen empresses, the crown jewels of a dynasty that had ruled since the thirteenth century—all gone. What remained was packed into a few trunks aboard the Glowworm: photographs, prayer books, and the letters Charles had written in those desperate weeks of 1917, the letters that had destroyed him.
As the ship passed through the Iron Gates of the Danube, where the river narrows between towering cliffs, Charles stood at the rail for a long time. “Napoleon died on an island like this,” he said to no one in particular. Captain Snack, standing nearby, replied carefully: “Madeira is not quite St. Helena, Your Majesty. And you are not quite Napoleon.” Charles almost smiled. “No. Napoleon won battles.”
In the ports along the way, telegraph operators tapped out the news: the last Habsburg emperor was passing through, a ghost of the old Europe that the war had swept away. Some newspapers called him a traitor. Others called him a fool. A few, remembering the hungry winter of 1916 and the young monarch who had walked among the starving in Favoriten, called him a good man who had been given an impossible throne.
Zita, seven months pregnant with their eighth child, spent the evenings reading to the children in the cramped cabin. The eldest, Otto, barely six years old, asked his father why they could not go home. Charles knelt beside him and said: “Because home is not ours anymore, my son. But it will be yours to remember.” It was the closest he came to explaining the inexplicable—that a dynasty six and a half centuries old had ended not with a battle, but with a signature and a lie.
When the Glowworm finally reached the open sea, Charles fell ill. The ship’s doctor diagnosed a chill, then a fever. By the time the Azores appeared on the horizon, the former emperor could barely leave his bunk. Zita nursed him through the nights, and Erdödy wrote in his journal: “His Majesty grows weaker. He speaks of Vienna, of the smell of the imperial stables, of his mother. He does not speak of the war.”
In Funchal, the capital of Madeira, the British authorities had prepared a modest villa on a hillside above the harbor. It was comfortable enough, with a view of the Atlantic and a garden where the children could play. But it was also damp, and the winter rains had begun. Charles, who had spent his youth hunting in the Austrian Alps, now shivered in the subtropical air and coughed through the long, humid nights.
It was there, in that quiet house above the sea, that the last emperor of Austria would spend his final months—writing letters to monarchists who no longer answered, planning a restoration that would never come, and praying for a peace that had already been lost.
The Madeira rains came early that winter, drumming on the villa’s roof like distant artillery. Charles spent his mornings at the window, watching the Atlantic churn, and his afternoons dictating letters to Zita that he knew would never reach Vienna. “Tell them I did not abdicate,” he insisted, though the republic had already declared otherwise. His throne was gone, but his stubbornness remained.
Tomas Erdödy stayed through the autumn, keeping his journal as faithfully as he had in Laxenburg. He recorded the small things: the emperor’s cough growing worse, the way Zita read aloud from the Psalms, the children’s laughter echoing through a house that had no courtiers. “His Majesty no longer speaks of Alsace-Lorraine,” Erdödy wrote. “He speaks of his mother, of the horses at Schönbrunn, of the first time he saw the empress at a ball.”
Charles’s health collapsed in March. The pneumonia came fast, and the island’s doctors could do little. On the first of April, 1922, he called for his son Otto—now nine years old and heir to a crown that no longer existed. “Be a good man,” he whispered. “A better man than I was.” He died hours later, at thirty-four, clutching a crucifix that had belonged to his mother.
Zita lived on for sixty-seven more years, dressed in black, never remitting her claim to divine right. She outlived the empire, the republic, the Anschluss, and the Cold War, dying in 1989 at ninety-seven—still an empress in her own mind. Erdödy’s diaries, buried in a Vienna archive for a century, finally told the truth of the man who tried to end a war and lost everything instead.
Was Charles I a peacemaker betrayed by his own weakness, or a fool who gambled an empire on a secret letter? History has never quite decided—and perhaps that is the most fitting epitaph of all. What do you think: hero, traitor, or simply a man in the wrong century? Share your verdict in the comments below.
Report this article
Select a reason for reporting: